Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the healthcare system. It has led to the use of temporary isolation systems and less-then-optimum patient placement configurations because of inadequate number of isolation rooms, both of which can compromise provider safety. Three key elements require special attention to reduce the maximum and average aerosolized contaminant concentration exposure to a healthcare worker in any isolation system: flow rate; air changes per hour; and patient placement. This is important because concentration exposures of aerosolized contaminants to healthcare workers in hospitals using temporary isolation systems can reach levels 21–30 times greater than a properly engineered negative pressure isolation room. A working knowledge of these three elements can help create a safer environment for healthcare workers when isolation rooms are not available.

Highlights

  • Controlling both the droplet component and the aerosol component of an infectious process is critical to stopping the spread of an infection

  • SUMMARY There are three key physical elements to understand when working with isolation systems

  • The magnitude of the air changes per hour (ACH) determines the time the isolation system will reach 99% of its steady state value (T99%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Controlling both the droplet component and the aerosol component of an infectious process is critical to stopping the spread of an infection. The interior of some common barrier devices can create unsafe, contaminated air [21-30] times higher than inside a standard negative pressure isolation room (NPIR) when an aerosol is present. Healthcare providers need to be aware of two potentially dangerous situations when using temporary isolation devices by considering the role of the droplet component and the role the aerosol component plays in the potential to spread infections. Consider if prior to intubation, a provider needed to attend to a patient inside a portable isolation box to access their central line for example. Assuming the provider is not wearing a powered air purifying respirator (PAPR), if their face is near or inside the opening of the isolation device their N-95 mask has to filter air [21-30] times more contaminated when wearing the N-95 mask in a standard NPIR. The use of an isolation box in a hallway could expose this highly contaminated air to other patients or visitors in the hallway

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.