Abstract

In [1] and [2], S. Yu. Maslov proposed an “inverse method” of establishing deducibility in classical predicate calculus.† In the deduction search by this method the “volume” of choices grows substantially as the quantity of favorable sets accumulated to a given time increases. Moreover, in discarding the ends of favorable sets by rule B in the “inverse method” some information is lost, whose utilization might shorten the subsequent process of establishing deducibility in a number of cases. Hence, it is expedient to try to decrease the quantity of objects participating in the choice by the maximal “merger” of favorable sets into one object (if only of more complex structure) and to take account of the mentioned information.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call