Abstract

PurposeTo investigate whether a 3D-modified driven equilibrium Fourier transform (MDEFT)-based acquisition protocol established for brain morphometry also yields reliable information about the cross-sectional spinal cord area (SCA).Materials and MethodsImages of brain and cervical cord of 10 controls and eight subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) were acquired with the 3D-MDEFT-based imaging protocol and an 8-channel receive head coil. The new protocol was validated by two observers 1) comparing the SCA measured with the standard acquisition protocol (3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo [MPRAGE] and dedicated spine coil) and the new protocol; and 2) determining the scan–rescan reproducibility of the new protocol.ResultsScan–rescan reproducibility of SCA measurements with the MDEFT approach showed a similar precision for both observers with standard deviation (SD) <4.5 mm2 and coefficient of variation (CV) ≤5.1%. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a main effect of observer and interaction between observer and scan protocol that could be primarily attributed to a small observer bias for MPRAGE (difference in SCA <2.1 mm2). No bias was observed for 3D-MDEFT vs. 3D-MPRAGE.ConclusionThe 3D-MDEFT method allows for robust unbiased assessment of SCA in addition to brain morphology. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:1242–1247. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Highlights

  • Purpose: >To investigate whether a 3D-modified driven equilibrium Fourier transform (MDEFT)-based acquisition protocol established for brain morphometry yields reliable information about the cross-sectional spinal cord area (SCA)

  • Scan–rescan reproducibility of SCA measurements with the MDEFT approach showed a similar precision for both observers with standard deviation (SD)

  • The 3D-MDEFT method allows for robust unbiased assessment of SCA in addition to brain morphology

Read more

Summary

Materials and Methods

Images of brain and cervical cord of 10 controls and eight subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) were acquired with the 3D-MDEFT-based imaging protocol and an 8-channel receive head coil. The new protocol was validated by two observers 1) comparing the SCA measured with the standard acquisition protocol (3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo [MPRAGE] and dedicated spine coil) and the new protocol; and 2) determining the scan–rescan reproducibility of the new protocol

Results
Conclusion
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call