Abstract

Indoor climate affects health and productivity of the occupants in office buildings, yet in many buildings of this type indoor climate conditions are not well-controlled due to insufficient heating or cooling capacity, high swings of external or internal heat loads, improper control or operation of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment, etc. However, maintenance of good indoor environmental conditions in buildings requires increased investments and possible higher energy consumption. This paper focuses on the relation between investment costs for retrofitting HVAC equipment as well as decreased energy use and improved performance of occupants in office buildings. The cost-benefit analysis implementation algorithm is presented in this paper, including energy survey of the building, estimation of occupants dissatisfied by key indoor climate indicators using questionnaire survey and measurements. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis is used in the proposed method for data processing. A case study of an office building is presented in order to introduce an application example of the proposed method. Results of the study verify the applicability of the proposed algorithm and TOPSIS analysis as a practical tool for office building surveys in order to maximize productivity by means of cost efficient technical building retrofitting solutions.

Highlights

  • Financial losses related to decreased office work performance in most cases are several times higher compared to the energy saved due to reduced indoor environmental conditions

  • The Energy Performance and Occupant Productivity assessment method (EP-OP) method for office building refurbishment analysis considering both energy efficiency and office work performance is presented in the paper

  • The method involves a set of procedures which include technical and energy consumption data collection, a questionnaire survey as well as measurements of the indoor environmental conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Financial losses related to decreased office work performance in most cases are several times higher compared to the energy saved due to reduced indoor environmental conditions. Seppänen et al [5] outlined a relation between human performance and air temperature based on various productivity studies. It showed that performance increases when the air temperature rises up to. 21–22 °C and decreases by approximately 2% per 1 °C increase of air temperature in the range of. The relationship was statistically significant within air temperature ranges below 20 °C or above 24 °C. The maximum performance is achieved at air temperature of ca. The maximum performance is achieved at air temperature of ca. 22 °C

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call