Abstract
Chinese standards and foreign standards differ in technical indicators and requirements, which result in the poor recognition of products that comply with Chinese standards. It is crucial to set up a universal method to compare standard indicators, so that the inconsistency between standards could be eliminated, and ultimately improve Chinese products competitiveness. This paper proposed a method for indicator comparison from standards. Based on Semantic Web technology, the method introduced fragmentation of standard documents in a manner of ‘product stylistic rule indicator’ triplet. The processed fragments were annotated by the knowledge-based organization and used for the following indicator comparison. The method and procedure were generalized to develop standard indicator comparison system. The system provided a great experience in representing technical indicators as well as the comparison of indicators from standards. Further practice of the system suggested that repeated standard development and conflicted indicators in Chinese standards are still common.
Highlights
Standard is a vital technical component in international cooperation, playing an irreplaceable role as the pass and bridge connecting technological achievements and industry practice
By establishing the Resource Description Framework (RDF) applicable to the standard indicators, this paper developed a “standard indicator comparison method” including fragmentation of standard documents, knowledge reorganization, and standard indicator comparison
Based on Semantic Web technologies, this paper develops a standard indicator comparison system using “productstylistic rule-indicator” triplet
Summary
Standard is a vital technical component in international cooperation, playing an irreplaceable role as the pass and bridge connecting technological achievements and industry practice. Due to several factors, including the indicator difference between Chinese standards and the standards implemented in developed countries, Chinese products recalled from foreign markets have been rapidly increasing in the last few years. The Office of the Leading Group for the Belt and Road Initiative issued the Action Plan on Belt and Road Standard Connectivity, with the intent to speed up the development and implementation of Chinese standard "going global" work plan [11]. Under this circumstance, standardization work has drawn unprecedented attention. It is imperative to study universal methods to compare indicators between Chinese and foreign standards in various industries
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
