Metatarsal Head Resection Versus a Removable Mechanical Device for Offloading of the Neuropathic Diabetic Plantar Forefoot Ulcer.

Abstract

Although surgical offloading seems a more permanent solution for prevention and treatment of neuropathic plantar diabetic forefoot ulcers (DFUs), the evidence for this assumption is weak and needs further studies to be established. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the healing efficacy, associated morbidity, and recurrence rates of surgical versus removable knee-high offloading for neuropathic plantar (DFUs) healing. From January 2016 to January 2018, 70 neuropathic plantar forefoot DFUs were nonrandomly assigned to either removable knee-high cam-walker (n = 35), or metatarsal head, or accessory bone resection (n = 35). The primary endpoints were the frequency and rate of complete healing, and the rate of ulcer area reduction within 4 months. The secondary endpoints were 4 months morbidity and ulcer recurrence within 12 months. After 4 months, complete healing was significantly inferior with cam-walker compared with surgical offloading; 24 (67.6%) versus 31 patients (88.6%), respectively, P = .015. Ulcer area reduction was 2.4 cm2 (66.7%) versus 2.6 cm2 (83.9%), P = .001, in the mechanical versus the surgical groups, respectively. The mean healing time was 3.6 ± 2.1 versus 2.8 ± 0.6 months in the mechanical versus the surgical groups, respectively, P = .012. Morbidity and recurrence show nonsignificant differences between both groups. Ulcer recurrence was noted in 5/35 (14.3%) versus 2/35 (5.7%), in mechanical versus surgical groups, respectively, P = .23. Therefore, metatarsal head/accessory bone resection offered improved healing efficacy but similar morbidity and recurrence to the removable cam-walker.