Abstract

The Transcendental Psychology Approach to the study of perception has been developed by A.I. Mirakyan at the Psychological Institute (Moscow, Russia) about 30 years ago. This article considers the results of theoretical and experimental investigations and provides a historical overview of the approach’s development. Started with the investigations of constancy in perception, it went beyond the traditional Product Basis Paradigm (relying on perceptual features for finding perceptual mechanisms) into Philosophical Metaphysics of “nothing” and “something” concepts for revealing the form-generating principles as fundamental axiomatics of the Transcendental Psychology Approach. Several principles were developed and justified: structure-process anisotropy, spatial-temporal discreteness, the formation of anisotropic (particularly, symmetric) relations, the coexistence of alternatives, and some others. Principles are explanatory for the regulations of sensory-perceptual processes and are the direct object of further specification and experimental verification using hypothetical transcendental models of perceptual structures. The theory suggests that the internal mechanisms of these models would not naturally manifest themselves in experiments within the functional range of perception, and to see the phenomena, it is necessary to bring the perceptual system out of its natural functional range. The form-generating processes are named adiaphorous in the sense that they specifically generate new structures and forms, regardless of the characteristics of products used and produced in the processes. In general, it is possible to speak about the class of so-called structurally-generative processes that are specific to the process of transition between the system-generating structures studied by different hierarchically interrelated sciences. The proposed two-staged qualitative model of the perceptual process consists of two substantially different parts: the direct sensory perception and a process of form designation or sensory name assignment. Further investigations of structurally-generative processes seem likely to shed light on the mechanisms of brain function and to contribute strategically to new directions in philosophical psychology and neuroscience.

Highlights

  • Studies in the field of philosophy of science have shown that scientific research is updated within the framework and concepts of a specific paradigm, which implies the presence of certain metaphysical premises that underlie science (Wartofsky, 1967; Kuhn, 1962; Agassi, 1964)

  • Started with the investigations of constancy in perception, it went beyond the traditional Product Basis Paradigm into Philosophical Metaphysics of “nothing” and “something” concepts for revealing the form-generating principles as fundamental axiomatics of the Transcendental Psychology Approach

  • It is possible to speak about the class of so-called structurally-generative processes that are specific to the process of transition between the system-generating structures studied by different hierarchically interrelated sciences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studies in the field of philosophy of science have shown that scientific research is updated within the framework and concepts of a specific paradigm, which implies the presence of certain metaphysical premises that underlie science (Wartofsky, 1967; Kuhn, 1962; Agassi, 1964). These assumptions, which may have the character of heuristic metaphysical ideas, are often taken unconsciously and determine the fundamental or important topics and problems considered in science. In contrast to other sciences, in psychology the psyche acts simultaneously as an object of research and as a means (way of thinking) of its own research, that is, the psyche coincides as an object and as a means of its research

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call