Abstract
People perceive the world through metaphors and tend to align their behaviour to match those metaphorically framed perceptions. Politics, which promotes partisan world-views, recruits metaphor to frame ideologies and shape opinion. Notably, metaphors generate a profiling function that confers cognitive salience and emotional relevance to selective focal points, to gain special prominence in texts and talks. Electoral rhetoric, commonly viewed as selective in nature and persuasive in purpose, seems moreover to enact manipulative and potentially deceptive schemes. Building on the use of the Wall metaphor in Tunisian electoral politics, this article sheds light on the deliberate use of political metaphors for deceptive purposes. Considered as an examplar of ‘metaphors we vote by’, the Wall metaphor structured Tunisian electoral campaign speeches around an alarming car-crash scenario to trigger emotion and afford cognition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
