Abstract

The metallurgical behaviour of HSLA steel subjected to underwater explosion is of prime importance because of its structural applications in underwater vehicles. HSLA steel plates 300 × 250 × 4 mm were subjected to single and repetitive shock loadings and the point of rupture was identified. Test plates exhibited mode-I (large ductile deformation) and mode-II (tensile tearing) macroscopic failures. Electron micrographic and fractographic examination showed that the initiation of fracture was due to adiabatic shearing and the microscopic mode of failure was ductile. Plates subjected to single shock showed an increase in residual hardness and at the point of rupture it was approximately one-third higher than the initial residual hardness.

Highlights

  • The ability of a material to withstand large plastic deformation before it fractures is a major criterion in underwater structural applications (Sumpter, 1987)

  • The Explosion Bulge Test (EBT) has been used as the final qualification test to verify the dynamic plasticity of structural materials (Porter, 1988)

  • Performance of steel plates and weldments subjected to a high level of dynamic plastic deformation from explosive shock has been studied extensively by various authors

Read more

Summary

Metallurgical Investigation of HSLA Steel Subjected to Underwater Explosion

The metallurgical behaviour of HSLA steel subjected to underwater explosion is of prime importance because ofits structural applications in underwater vehicles. HSLA steel plates 300 x 250 x 4 mm were subjected to single and repetitive shock loadings and the point of rupture was identified. Test plates exhibited mode-/ (large ductile deformation) and mode-II (tensile tearing) macroscopic failures. Electron micrographic andfractographic examination showed that the initiation offracture was due to adiabatic shearing and the microscopic mode offailure was ductile. Plates subjected to single shock showed an increase in residual hardness and at the point of rupture it was approximately one-third higher than the initial residual hardness

INTRODUCTION
Rupt ure
Adiabatic Shear
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
UI i c
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.