Abstract

Measurement of the redox potentials (E1/2) of ferrocene (1), decamethylferrocene (2), decamethylcobaltocene (3), and [FeICp*(η6-C6Me6)] (4) (Cp* = η5-C5Me5) in DMF, CH3CN, THF, DME, CH2Cl2, and DMSO were recorded vs. the saturated calomel electrode (SCE), showing that the E1/2 value of 1 was more solvent dependent than those of 2–4, and that the difference in E1/2 values among 2–4 was solvent independent, unlike those found between 1 and 2–4. This shows that 2–4 are much more reliable internal references for determining redox potentials than 1, but using data from this article, one can convert the literature values reported vs. 1 into values vs. 2, 3, or 4. The electrochemistry of 1 and 2 is all the more inhibited by polyamine dendrimers as the dendrimer generation is higher. On the other hand, ferrocenes or other iron sandwich compounds containing hydroxy groups can reestablish reversible cyclic voltammograms. It is shown, using a tetra(ferrocenylmethylamine), that this phenomenon is due to hydrogen bonding between the amido and phenol groups rather than bonding of hydroxy groups to the electrode surface.Key words: ferrocene, reference, electrochemistry, metallocene, sandwich complex, iron, dendrimer, passivation, hydrogen bond.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call