Abstract

To better understand the effects of ligand configuration on hydroformylation reactions carried out in the presence of LiBPh 4·3dme (dme = 1,2-dimethoxyethane), a conformationally restrained bis(phosphite) ligand derived from 1,2-bis-(2-hydroxyethoxy)benzene, {[(2,2′-O 2C 12H 8)P(C 2H 4O 2)] 2C 6H 4}, 1, has been prepared and its Rh(I) metallacrown ether complex has been evaluated as a catalyst for the hydroformylation of styrene. Both the activity and regioselectivity of the catalyst are sensitive to the amount of the LiBPh 4·3dme added with the activity decreasing by 16% and the regioselectivity for the iso increasing by 9% at a 8:1 LiBPh 4:Rh ratio. Model complexes for the octahedral, cis-Mo(CO) 4( 1), 2, and square planar, cis-PtCl 2( 1), 3, and cis-PdCl 2( 1), 4, complexes in the catalytic cycle has been have been studied using multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Although the X-ray crystal structure of 2 suggests that the metallacrown ether ring could adopt a configuration capable of binding alkali metal cations, this does not appear to occur in a dichloromethane- d 2 solution of 2 because no shift in the 31P NMR resonance 2 is observed upon the addition of an excess of LiBPh 4·3dme. The 31P{ 1H} NMR spectra of chloroform- d solutions of 2 (in the presence of a catalytic amount of HgCl 2) and of 4 and the X-ray crystal structures of the complexes indicate that the bis(phosphite) ligands are cis coordinated in these complexes in both the solution and in the solid state. This is particularly surprising for 4 because related PdCl 2{Ph 2P(CH 2CH 2O) nCH 2CH 2PPh 2} ( n = 3–5) complexes exhibit both cis– trans and monomer–oligomer equilibria in solution.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call