Abstract

Titanite occurs as a widespread accessory phase in mineralised zones and alteration associated with iron oxide-copper gold (IOCG) and iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposits of Norrbotten County, Sweden, and is a major host of the REE in these deposits. In situ analyses of SmNd isotope ratios in titanites previously analysed for UPb geochronology and trace element composition confirms previous interpretations of grain scale isotopic heterogeneity. Initial Nd-isotope ratios expressed relative to CHUR range from ~−3 to −8 in IOA deposits, from ~−1 to −9 in IOCG deposits, and from +2 to −4 in the most Cu-rich, deformed IOCG deposits of the Nautanen Deformation zone. Within individual IOA deposits εNd varies relative to CHUR: from −3.1 to −4.0 at Valkommen (Malmberget), from −1.4 to −5.7 in grain cores, and −7.2 to −8.2 in grain rims rim at Gruvberget; and from −3.0 to −6.0 in grain cores and from −5.8 to −7.1 in grain rims at Luossavaara. In IOCG deposits at Rakkurijärvi εNd varies from −6.1. to −7.1, and in deformed IOCG deposits at Nautanen from −1.3 to −2.3. These values are consistent with the derivation of the REE, and potentially economically enriched metals, from the local volcanic sequence, either via granitic melts, or directly by leaching by metasomatic fluids. The most Cu-rich deposits reflect the involvement of more basic protoliths. The age distribution of these deposits suggest IOA deposit formation during the collisional phase of the Svecofennian orogeny (~1.9–1.8Ga), and IOCG mineralisation during this phase and during post-orogenic collapse (~1.8–1.7Ga), whilst model ages indicate the ultimate enrichment of the continental crust in these metals during pre-collisional extensional and subduction-related basic magmatism. These processes underscore the importance of continental cycles both in producing the preserved geological record of orogenic ore deposition, and in the generation of fertile continental crust, from which metals can be mobilised by subsequent events.

Highlights

  • The iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) and related iron oxide-apatite (IOA; ‘Kiruna type’) class of mineral deposits (Hitzman et al, 1992; Hitzman, 2000; Williams et al, 2005) have been the subject of intense debate, in terms of both their classification and genetic mechanism

  • Whilst IOCG deposits are unequivocally hydrothermal in origin, models for the genesis of IOA deposits have ranged from magmatic crystallisation (e.g. Nyström, 1985; Nyström and Henríquez, 1994) to hydrothermal processes (e.g Parak, 1975) and metasomatic replacement (e.g. Bookstrom, 1995; Blake, 1990), evidence is mounting to support a hydrothermal origin (Barton, 2014)

  • The titanite and allanite used in this study come from the IOA deposits at Kirunavaara, Malmberget and Gruvberget, and the IOCG deposits at Rakkurijärvi (Table 1; Smith et al, 2009) and Nautanen (Martinsson, 2004)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) and related iron oxide-apatite (IOA; ‘Kiruna type’) class of mineral deposits (Hitzman et al, 1992; Hitzman, 2000; Williams et al, 2005) have been the subject of intense debate, in terms of both their classification and genetic mechanism. Bookstrom, 1995; Blake, 1990), evidence is mounting to support a hydrothermal origin (Barton, 2014). Whilst IOCG deposits are unequivocally hydrothermal in origin, models for the genesis of IOA deposits have ranged from magmatic crystallisation For both IOA and IOCG deposits the origin of mineralising fluids in hydrothermal models is problematic, with both magmatic-sourced brines A critical part of these models must be to identify the source of metals, but studies in this area have been relatively limited. Gleason et al (2000) showed that for IOCG/IOA systems ranging from Protoerozoic to Palaeogene in age the source of Nd determined from radioisotope systematics was in each case the pre-existing host igneous rocks rather than any specialised magmatic source. Mathur et al (2002) used initial Os isotope ratios in magnetite to argue for contrasting metal sources in iron oxide-apatite (host sedimentary rocks) versus IOCG deposits (Cretaceous intrusive rocks) in the Chilean Iron Belt

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call