Abstract

Metal oxide nanomaterials are widely used in various areas; however, the divergent published toxicology data makes it difficult to determine whether there is a risk associated with exposure to metal oxide nanomaterials. The application of quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) modeling in metal oxide nanomaterials toxicity studies can reduce the need for time-consuming and resource-intensive nanotoxicity tests. The nanostructure and inorganic composition of metal oxide nanomaterials makes this approach different from classical QSAR study; this review lists and classifies some structural descriptors, such as size, cation charge, and band gap energy, in recent metal oxide nanomaterials quantitative nanostructure activity relationship (QNAR) studies and discusses the mechanism of metal oxide nanomaterials toxicity based on these descriptors and traditional nanotoxicity tests.

Highlights

  • Nanotechnology involves the study of the synthesis, characterization, and properties of nanomaterials [1]

  • Metal oxide nanomaterials quantitative nanostructure activity relationship (QNAR) modeling is a comprehensive task that requires the combined efforts of toxicologists, inorganic chemists, materials scientists, and statisticians

  • We use QNAR model to predict the toxicity of metal oxide nanomaterials; there were unavoidable problems in recent QNAR models, which are discussed here

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nanotechnology involves the study of the synthesis, characterization, and properties of nanomaterials [1]. Performing toxicology tests for each metal oxide nanomaterial is time consuming and resource intensive; researchers are developing computational nanotoxicology methods, such as quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) modeling, to predict the toxicity of metal oxide nanomaterials. Such predictions would allow researchers to prioritize toxicology tests on real metal oxide nanomaterials [18].

Summary
Experimental Descriptors
Morphological Structural Properties
Physicochemical Properties
Theoretical Descriptors
Constitutional Properties
Electronic Properties
Liquid Drop Model
QSAR-Perturbation Approach Based Descriptors
Optimal SMILE-Based Descriptor
Conclusions and Outlook
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.