Abstract

The recent surge in incorporation of metallic and metal oxide nanomaterials into consumer products and their corresponding use in occupational settings have raised concerns over the potential for metals to induce size-specific adverse toxicological effects. Although nano-metals have been shown to induce greater lung injury and inflammation than their larger metal counterparts, their size-related effects on the immune system and allergic disease remain largely unknown. This knowledge gap is particularly concerning since metals are historically recognized as common inducers of allergic contact dermatitis, occupational asthma, and allergic adjuvancy. The investigation into the potential for adverse immune effects following exposure to metal nanomaterials is becoming an area of scientific interest since these characteristically lightweight materials are easily aerosolized and inhaled, and their small size may allow for penetration of the skin, which may promote unique size-specific immune effects with implications for allergic disease. Additionally, alterations in physicochemical properties of metals in the nano-scale greatly influence their interactions with components of biological systems, potentially leading to implications for inducing or exacerbating allergic disease. Although some research has been directed toward addressing these concerns, many aspects of metal nanomaterial-induced immune effects remain unclear. Overall, more scientific knowledge exists in regards to the potential for metal nanomaterials to exacerbate allergic disease than to their potential to induce allergic disease. Furthermore, effects of metal nanomaterial exposure on respiratory allergy have been more thoroughly-characterized than their potential influence on dermal allergy. Current knowledge regarding metal nanomaterials and their potential to induce/exacerbate dermal and respiratory allergy are summarized in this review. In addition, an examination of several remaining knowledge gaps and considerations for future studies is provided.

Highlights

  • Over the past several decades, an extensive amount of scientific attention has been invested in the field of nanotechnology

  • Azobenzene dye hapten conjugation to AuNP led to high yield of IgG specific to the agent indicating the capacity for AuNP to act as both a carrier and adjuvant

  • Reactivity, and uptake all influenced the degree of mediator release by cells Rutile TiO2NP caused the greatest increase in OVA-specific serum IgE and IgG1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past several decades, an extensive amount of scientific attention has been invested in the field of nanotechnology. Significant advances have been made in understanding the unique behaviors of matter with nano-scale dimensions. This progress has facilitated the capacity for manipulation of material properties to optimize their functional utility. The exponential growth of the nanotechnology field has left few sectors unaffected by its momentum, as the global nanotechnology market has been valued at over $20 billion US (Nanomaterials Future Markets 2015). In addition to the environmental, legal, ethical, and regulatory challenges imposed by the expanding presence of nanotechnology, the potential risk for adverse health effects following exposure to nanomaterials has become a major concern

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call