Abstract

Freshwater mussels are widely used in the monitoring of pollution because they are filter-feeding, long-lived animals that tend to accumulate metals in their shells. The temporal scale of such studies can reach thousands of years, since the composition of shells preserves them against decay. This allows us to reconstruct past environmental conditions and to compare current environmental conditions to those prevalent thousands of years ago. Here we assessed metal concentrations (Ca, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) in recently harvested mussel shells and mussel shells found by archaeologists, and tested the hypothesis that levels of some metals are higher in today's shells, reflecting increasing anthropogenic impact. We observed lower metal concentrations (with the exception of Cd) in shells found by archaeologists (n = 35) than in recently harvested mussel shells (n = 14) (Unio crassus, Unio pictorum, Unio tumidus) in the same water bodies. There were no significant differences in metal levels among species in shells found by archaeologists, while in recently harvested mussels almost all metals for which we tested were found in their highest levels in Unio crassus. The results suggest that metal concentrations in prehistoric times were lower than today, which probably reflects human impact, rather than changes in the geochemical structure of rocks. The results also revealed that metal transfer between mussel shells and surrounding deposits does not occur. We therefore suggest that they might be successfully used as independent bioindicators.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call