Abstract

This paper reports on a research performed in the field of corpus linguistics on metadiscourse features in the British Academic Written English Corpus. For this purpose, the British Academic Written English Corpus, which is freely available and contains 6,968,089 words, was selected as the data resource of the study. The taxonomy of metadiscourse features compiled by Hyland was used as the theoretical framework and the R program was used as the statistical software. The whole corpus was analyzed. As the data can show, the interactive metadiscourse features were more prevalent than the interactional metadiscourse features. In the interactive category, transitions and endophoric markers were used more than other ones; whereas, in the interactional category, hedges and boosters were the predominant metadiscourse features. The prevalence nature of interactive metadiscourse features can add support to the idea that writers were more interested in organizing discourse rather than conducting interaction. The findings of this research can have useful implications for researchers in such fields as contrastive analysis, text linguistics and corpus-based studies.

Highlights

  • This paper reports on a research performed in the field of corpus linguistics on metadiscourse features in the British Academic Written English Corpus

  • The second research question was concerned with the distribution pattern of interactional metadiscourse features in the corpus

  • The instances of interactional metadiscourse features were extracted in the corpus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper reports on a research performed in the field of corpus linguistics on metadiscourse features in the British Academic Written English Corpus. For this purpose, the British Academic Written English Corpus, which is freely available and contains 6,968,089 words, was selected as the data resource of the study. The interactive metadiscourse features were more prevalent than the interactional metadiscourse features in the corpus. The prevalence nature of interactive metadiscourse features can add support to the idea that writers were more interested in organising discourse rather than conducting interaction to the audience. The findings of this research can have useful implications for researchers in such fields as contrastive analysis, text linguistics and corpus-based studies

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call