Abstract

This is an ethnographic qualitative research of which three main objectives are to describe the 1) advanced, 2) intermediate, and 3) low metacognition levels in solving mathematics problem. In conducting the research, purposive sampling technique was used to determine the research subjects that were the students (i.e. the students with advanced, intermediate, and low metacognition levels) of X IPA 3 class of SMA Negeri 2 Surakarta. The data were collected through observations, documentations, and interviews in which the data validity was measured using triangulation between the sources and the methods used. Afterwards, the data were analyzed inductively. The results of this research suggested that: 1) students with advanced metacognition level are able to perform all the characteristics of awareness aspect in indicator A1, three characteristics of evaluation aspect of indicator E1, and two characteristics of regulation aspect in indicator R1, 2) students with intermediate metacognition level are able to perform four characteristics of awareness aspect in A1, two characteristics of evaluation aspect in E1 indicator, and two characteristics of regulation aspect in R1, 3) students with low metacognition level are able to perform two characteristics of awareness aspect in A1, two characteristics of evaluation aspects in E1, and one characteristic of regulation aspect in R1.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call