Abstract
Background: Transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) and interferential electrical stimulation (IES) attenuates muscle metaboreflex by sympathetic nervous modulation. Objective: We tested the hypothesis that IES may be more effective than TENS to improves blood flow which may be linked to greater of deep tissue. Methods: Eleven health subjects were randomized to TENS (80 Hz, 150μs), IES (4000 Hz, ΔAMF=25 Hz) or sham stimulation group, during 30 minutes. The acute intervention was applied on stellate ganglion region (C7-T4). Results: Were measured metaboreflex activity by calf vascular resistance (CVR) and calf blood flow (CBF) and HRV during three times: rest, exercise (static handgrip) and postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO+ and PECO-). At the exercise peak, compared with TENS and Sham, the IES group reduced CVR (36 ± 3 vs 43 ± 3; p<0.05) and increased CBF (p<0.01). Also, IES was associated with a greater reduction on the MMA (IES: 9 ± 2, TENS: 14 ± 4, Sham: 26 ± 5 units; p<0.01). Furthermore, the IES group had a higher reduction of LF/HF ratio during PECO- and PECO+ (p<0.05). Conclusion: The IES over the stellate ganglion region seems to have superior efficacy compared with TENS to attenuate metaboreflex activation and vasodilatory responses during exercise in healthy subjects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.