Abstract

ObjectiveTo characterize the serum metabolomic profile and its role in the prediction of poor ovarian response (POR).Patient(s)Twenty-five women with normal ovarian reserve (24-33 years, antral follicle count [AFC] ≥5, anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] ≥1.2 ng/ml) as the control group and another twenty-five women with POR (19-35 years, AFC <5, AMH < 1.2 ng/ml) as the study group were collected in our study. The serum levels of the women in both groups were determined from their whole blood by untargeted liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Multivariate statistical analysis and cell signal pathways analysis were used to reveal the results.ResultsA total of 538 different metabolites were finally identified in the two groups. Tetracosanoic acid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, lidocaine, cortexolone, prostaglandin H2,1-naphthylamine, 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furancarboxaldehyde, 2,4-dinitrophenol, and D-erythrulose1-phosphate in POR were significantly different from control as were most important metabolites in support vector machines (p <0.05). Metabolomic profiling, together with support vector machines and pathway analysis found that the nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism pathway, including L-aspartic acid, 6-hydroxynicotinate, maleic acid, and succinic acid semialdehyde, was identified to have significant differences in POR women compared to control women, which may be associated with ovarian reserve.ConclusionThis study indicated that LC–MS-based untargeted metabolomics analysis of serum provided biological markers for women with POR. The nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism pathway may offer new insight into the complementary prediction and therapeutic potential of POR. The functional associations of these metabolites need further investigation.

Highlights

  • Poor ovarian response (POR), called low ovarian response, is characterized by the pathological state of poor ovarian response to gonadotropin (GN) stimulation

  • In the process of ovulation induction of assisted reproductive technology (ART), some patients suffer from a low peak value of blood estrogen (E2) on hCG administration day and a low number of retrieved oocytes, which are often accompanied by the large consumption of GN and a high cycle cancellation rate, which are collectively known as low ovarian response (POR)

  • A total of 50 subjects were enrolled in our study, including 25 control women with normal ovarian reserve (24-33 years, antral follicle count (AFC) ≥5, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≥1.2 ng/ml) and 25 study women with POR (19-35 years, AFC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Poor ovarian response (POR), called low ovarian response, is characterized by the pathological state of poor ovarian response to gonadotropin (GN) stimulation. Compared with Bologna standard [1], the Poseidon standard [2] wholly considers the age, ovarian reserve, and responsiveness of POR patients. Current main diagnostic indexes of ovary reserve include age, basal serum follicular stimulating hormone (FSH), basic serum inhibin B, serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), basal ovarian volume, basal serum E2, and so on [3]. A retrospective cohort study showed a novel mathematical model of true ovarian reserve assessment named the AAFA model based on predicted probability of POR: AMH, AFC, FSH, and age, in that order [6]. How can we predict POR before these indicators change? We want to use metabolites in the serum as biomarkers in POR to infer whether these metabolites are related to ordinary diet or living environment, so as to provide more etiology guidance for the prevention or early treatment of POR

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call