Abstract

The sulfonate compound 2,3-dihydroxypropane-1-sulfonate (DHPS) is one of the most abundant organic sulfur compounds in the biosphere. DHPS derived from dietary intake could be transformed into sulfide by intestinal microbiota and thus impacts human health. However, little is known about its sulfur transformation and subsequent impacts in marine environment. In this study, laboratory-culturing was combined with targeted metabolomic, chemical fluorescence probing, and comparative proteomic methods to examine the bioavailability of chiral DHPS (R and S isomers) for bacteria belonging to the marine Roseobacter clade. The metabolic potential of DHPS in bacteria was further assessed based on genomic analysis. Roseobacter members Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, Dinoroseobacter shibae DFL 12, and Roseobacter denitrificans OCh 114 could utilize chiral DHPS for growth, producing sulfite. They all contained a similar gene cluster for DHPS metabolism but differed in the genes encoding enzymes for desulfonation. There was no significant difference in the growth rate and DHPS consumption rate for R. pomeroyi DSS-3 between R- and S-DHPS cultures, with few proteins expressed differentially were found. Proteomic data suggested that a series of hydrogenases oxidized DHPS, after which desulfonation could proceed via three distinct enzymatic pathways. Strain R. pomeroyi DSS-3 completed the desulfonation via L-cysteate sulfo-lyase, while D. shibae DFL 12 and R. denitrificans OCh 114 primarily utilized sulfolactate sulfo-lyase, and sulfopyruvate decarboxylase followed by sulfoacetaldehyde acetyltransferase, respectively, to complete desulfonation releasing the sulfonate-moiety. The sulfite could be further oxidized or incorporated into sulfate assimilation, indicated by the proteomic data. Furthermore, DHPS metabolic pathways were found primarily in marine bacterial groups, including the majority of sequenced Roseobacter genomes. Our results suggest that chiral DHPS, as a vital reduced sulfur reservoir, could be metabolized by marine bacteria, providing a resource for bacterial growth, rather than acting as a source of toxic sulfide within the marine ecosystem.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call