Abstract

Ecological diversification depends on the extent of genetic variation and on the pattern of covariation with respect to ecological opportunities. We investigated the pattern of utilization of carbon substrates in wild populations of budding yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. All isolates grew well on a core diet of about 10 substrates, and most were also able to grow on a much larger ancillary diet comprising most of the 190 substrates we tested. There was substantial genetic variation within each population for some substrates. We found geographical variation of substrate use at continental, regional, and local scales. Isolates from Europe and North America could be distinguished on the basis of the pattern of yield across substrates. Two geographical races at the North American sites also differed in the pattern of substrate utilization. Substrate utilization patterns were also geographically correlated at local spatial scales. Pairwise genetic correlations between substrates were predominantly positive, reflecting overall variation in metabolic performance, but there was a consistent negative correlation between categories of substrates in two cases: between the core diet and the ancillary diet, and between pentose and hexose sugars. Such negative correlations in the utilization of substrate from different categories may indicate either intrinsic physiological trade-offs for the uptake and utilization of substrates from different categories, or the accumulation of conditionally neutral mutations. Divergence in substrate use accompanies genetic divergence at all spatial scales in S. paradoxus and may contribute to race formation and speciation.

Highlights

  • Populations adapt to altered conditions of growth through natural selection, provided that there is genetic variation in fitness

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • The divergence of substrate utilization between North American and European isolates is associated with the genetic divergence of European and North American populations documented by previous genetic surveys of isolates from MSH, Silwood, and other sites (Koufopanou et al 2006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Populations adapt to altered conditions of growth through natural selection, provided that there is genetic variation in fitness. Adaptation may be caused either by the sorting of standing genetic variation or by the cumulative selection of successive beneficial mutations (Barrett and Schluter 2008). The primary source of variation, and thereby the balance between sorting and cumulative selection, depends in part on the size of the population, because this will govern the number of beneficial mutations that arise during a given period of time. Animals and plants are larger and less abundant. The size of a local population is difficult to define because its limits are unclear, but the steep decline in maximum abundance with body size (Peters and Wassenberg 1983) implies that the local population of animals and plants a 2015 The Authors.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call