Abstract
BackgroundExcess visceral fat can accumulate owing to lack of exercise. The relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and spinal range of motion (ROM) is not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between MetS and spinal alignment and ROM. MethodsOrthopedic evaluation was prospectively performed in 544 participants. The participants were classified into two groups on the basis of the Japanese-specific MetS criteria proposed by the Japanese Committee of the Criteria for MetS (JCCMS). Lower back pain (LBP), knee joint pain with the visual analog scale (VAS), Kellgren–Lawrence (K–L) grade for knee osteoarthritis, body mass index (BMI), and spinal alignment and ROM were evaluated. ResultsForty-four (8.1%) were diagnosed as having MetS. The prevalence rate of K–L grade 4 in the MetS group was significantly higher than that in the non-MetS group (p < 0.05). When sex, age, and BMI were evaluated as covariates, there were significant differences in the VAS score for knee pain (non-MetS group vs MetS group: 13.7 vs 23.3, p < 0.05), L1–S1 flexion spinal ROM (44.1° vs 38.1°, p < 0.001), flexion spinal inclination angle (SIA) ROM (107.6° vs 99.3°, p < 0.01), and SIA ROM (135.4° vs 124.0°, p < 0.05). ConclusionsKnee pain increased and flexion spinal ROM decreased significantly in the MetS group as compared with non-MetS group. Systemic factors associated with MetS may have a specific impact on spinal ROM while promoting knee osteoarthrosis and increased knee pain.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.