Abstract
We have compared the metabolic consequences of two forms of exocrine drainage for pancreaticoduodenal transplant, duodenojejunostomy (DJ) and duodenocystostomy (DC). DC offered the advantage of avoiding opening of the recipient small intestine with its potential for wound sepsis, as well as a reliable method for early detection of pancreatic rejection as measured by an abrupt fall in urinary amylase and bicarbonate concentration. However, DC led to a large urinary loss of bicarbonate with a concomitant mild metabolic acidosis. During periods of renal dysfunction, the patients with DC developed severe hyperchloremic acidosis. Use of DC for pancreatic exocrine diversion may require patients to take supplemental bicarbonate even with a well-functioning renal transplant.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
