Abstract

BackgroundAcross China and Southeast Asia, an estimated 17,000 bears are currently farmed for bile, primarily for traditional medicines. Depending on country, bile is extracted daily via transabdominal gallbladder fistulas, indwelling catheters, or needle aspiration. Despite claims that bears do not develop adverse effects from bile extraction, health issues identified in bears removed from bile farms include bile-extraction site infections, abdominal hernias, peritonitis, cholecystitis, hepatic neoplasia, cardiac disease, skeletal abnormalities, and abnormal behaviors. We present a comprehensive assessment of the effects of bile farming by comparing serum biochemical and hematological values of bears from farms that were bile-extracted (BE) and bears from farms not bile-extracted (FNE) with bears from non-farm captive (ZOO) and free-range (FR) environments. We hypothesized BE bears would have significant laboratory abnormalities compared to all non-extracted bear groups. We also hypothesized BE bears would have reduced long-term survival compared to FNE bears despite removal from farms.ResultsBE bears exhibited the highest values and greatest variation (on a population level) in laboratory parameters compared to all non-extracted bear groups particularly for alanine transaminase, gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT), total bilirubin (TBIL), alkaline phosphatase (ALKP), blood urea nitrogen, creatinine (CREA), and total white blood cell count. Significant differences were detected between bear groups when accounting for season, sex, and/or age. BE bears exhibited greater mean serum GGT compared to all non-extracted bear groups, and the odds of having elevated TBIL were 7.3 times greater for BE bears, consistent with hepatobiliary disease. Biochemical parameter elevations in BE bears persisted up to 14 years post-rescue, consistent with long-term effects of bile-extraction. BE bears that arrived with elevated CREA and ALKP had median survival times of 1 and 4 years respectively, and regardless of laboratory abnormalities, BE bears had significantly shorter survival times compared to FNE bears.ConclusionsOur results provide strong evidence that bile extraction practices not only represent a temporary constraint for bears’ welfare, but confer distinct long-term adverse health consequences. Routine laboratory panels may be insensitive to detect the extent of underlying illness in BE bears as these bears have significantly reduced survival regardless of biochemical assessment compared to FNE bears.

Highlights

  • Across China and Southeast Asia, an estimated 17,000 bears are currently farmed for bile, primarily for traditional medicines

  • Serum biochemical and hematological parameter comparisons between bear groups The BE group exhibited the highest individual values and the widest range of values for serum biochemical analytes and hematological parameters. This observation was true for alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALKP), total bilirubin (TBIL), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CREA), and total white blood cell count (TWBC)

  • The proportion of BE bears that arrived from bile farms with increased activities of ALT, GGT, ALKP, and TBIL were 15% (36/239), 58% (126/217), 9% (20/222), and 10% (24/230), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Across China and Southeast Asia, an estimated 17,000 bears are currently farmed for bile, primarily for traditional medicines. Despite claims that bears do not develop adverse effects from bile extraction, health issues identified in bears removed from bile farms include bile-extraction site infections, abdominal hernias, peritonitis, cholecystitis, hepatic neoplasia, cardiac disease, skeletal abnormalities, and abnormal behaviors. Bile farming is controversial as it involves daily bile extraction over many years from living bears through surgically created transabdominal gallbladder fistulas or indwelling catheters (in China) [1, 4, 6, 7]. Numerous health issues have been identified in bears removed from bile farms including, but not limited to, emaciation, bile-extraction site infections, abdominal hernias, cholecystitis, gallbladder polyps, cholelithiasis, abdominal abscesses, septicemia, and peritonitis [6, 8]. Bile farmed bears are thought to have a greater prevalence and severity of disease, including comorbidities, than expected for most captive bears, and the types of disease, such as ruptured aortic aneurysm, appear unusual for bear species in general [9, 10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call