Abstract

Heat stress (HS) negatively affects animal performance, but little is known about energetic metabolism and behavior changes in dairy goats under HS conditions. Eight multiparous Murciano-Granadina dairy goats (43.3 ± 1.6 kg BW; 2 ± 0.04 L milk/d; 81 ± 3 days of lactation) were kept in metabolism cages and randomly assigned to two treatments varying in the temperature humidity index (THI). The design was crossover (two 28-d periods), and treatments were: 1) thermal neutral (TN; 15–20C, 40–45% humidity, THI = 59–65), and 2) heat stress (HS, 12 h/d at 37°C and 40%, and 12 h/d at 30°C and 40%, THI = 86 and 77, respectively). Jugular silicon catheters were fitted, and glucose tolerance test (0.25 g/kg BW), insulin tolerance test (4.6 μg/kg BW) and epinephrine challenge (2 μg/kg BW) were conducted. Before and after each metabolite administration, blood samples were collected for the analysis of insulin, glucose, and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA). Also, behavior variables (position changes, duration of remaining standing, as well as eating and drinking bouts and duration) were observed at day 3 of each period by video cameras. Heat stress reduced (P < 0.01) feed intake (−29%), milk yield (−10%), milk fat (–12%), milk protein (–14%), and milk casein (–13%). Goats in both groups had similar blood NEFA after insulin administration, but NEFA values were greater (P < 0.05) in TN than HS goats after epinephrine infusion. The HS goats secreted lower (P < 0.05) amounts of insulin than TN goats in response to the glucose tolerance test. Additionally, TN and HS goats had similar number of eating bouts, but the duration of each bout was shorter in HS than in TN. Also, HS had greater number of drinking bouts with no differences in drinking bout durations between groups. In conclusion, body lipid tissue of HS goats became more resistant to lipolysis, making them unable to mobilize body fat reserves despite the negative energy balance. In addition, the reduction in feed intake by HS was because of the shorter time of eating bouts, whereas the greater water consumption was related to the increase in drinking bouts.

Highlights

  • Heat stress (HS) negatively impacts productivity and health of live­ stock (Baumgard and Rhoads, 2013; Salama et al, 2014; Sejian et al, 2018)

  • This reduction in dry matter intake (DMI) is similar to DMI losses in heat-stressed Muraciano-Granadina goats at mid lactation (26–34%; Mehaba et al, 2019; Hamzaoui et al, 2020), but greater than losses observed during late lactation (19%; Hamzaoui et al, 2013)

  • Compared to thermal neutral (TN) goats, heat stress (HS) goats had the same response to insulin, but their adipose tissue was less sen­ sitive to lipolytic signals, which explains the lack of fat mobilization under HS conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heat stress (HS) negatively impacts productivity and health of live­ stock (Baumgard and Rhoads, 2013; Salama et al, 2014; Sejian et al, 2018). Adaptations to cope with HS include, but not limited to, greater sweating rate, elevated respiration rate, vasodilation with increased blood flow to the skin surface, reduced metabolic rate, decreased dry matter intake (DMI), and altered water metabolism (reviewed by Baumgard and Rhoads, 2013; Salama et al, 2016; Sejian et al, 2018). The reduction in insulin action allows adipose tissue lipolysis and the mobilization of nonesterified fatty acids (Bauman and Currie, 1980). In case of heat-stressed dairy cows (Rhoads et al, 2009) and ewes (Mehaba et al, 2021), blood nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) levels do not vary compared to thermal neutral (TN) ani­ mals despite the reduced DMI. Little is known on the response of heat-stressed dairy goats to such metabolic challenges

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.