Abstract
Recent studies have indicated that stem cell transplantation may be effective in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke in preclinical and clinical studies. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of science, and Ovid databases from inception through May 2018. A total of 11 preclinical studies-18 independent interventions were ultimately included. Similarly, 11 clinical studies were finally included. Two authors independently screened trials. Lesion volume and modified neurological severity scores (mNSSs) were regarded as outcome measures for preclinical studies. The composite weighted mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] effect sizes for lesion volume, percentage of lesion volume, and mNSSs were -46.59 (-62.04 to -31.15; P < 0.001), -13.18 (-25.62 to -0.73; P = 0.04), and -1.85 (-2.17 to -1.53; P < 0.001), respectively. Our analysis revealed that all three outcomes were significantly more favorable in the stem cell group than in the control group. Barthel index (BI) values, modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, and Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) scores were regarded as outcome measures for human studies. Our results were as follows: NIHSS [mean differences, MDs = -2.57, 95% CI (-3.45 to -1.68), I2 = 51%, P < 0.001]; BI [MD = 7.93, 95% CI (3.11 to 12.75), I2 = 59%, P = 0.001]; mRS [MD = -0.53, 95% CI (-0.73 to -0.28), I2 = 0%, P < 0.001]; FMA [MD = 5.50, 95% CI (2.05 to 8.95), I2 = 15%, P = 0.002]. These results suggest that stem cell transplantation was associated with significantly better outcomes than control treatment. Adverse reactions such as mild headache and fever resolved shortly after treatment. Stem cell transplantation can significantly improve neurological deficits and quality of life in patients with ischemic stroke, without severe adverse reactions. Our results also suggest that such treatment is most effective when provided earlier and through the intravenous route.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.