Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of erector spinal plane block (ESPB) after spinal fusion surgery in this study. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases were searched with a search deadline of March 30, 2024, and Stata 15.0 was used to analyze the data from the included studies. Result Nine randomized controlled trials involving 663 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that EPSB could reduce pain scores at 2h (standard mean difference (SMD) = −0.78, 95% CI [−1.38 to −0.19], GRADE: Moderate), 6 h (SMD = −0.81, 95% CI [−1.23 to −0.38], GRADE: Moderate), 12 h (SMD = −0.59, 95% CI [−1.05 to −0.13], GRADE: Moderate), 24 h (SMD = −0.54, 95% CI [−0.86 to −0.21], GRADE: Moderate), 48 h (SMD = −0.40, 95% CI [−0.75 to −0.05], GRADE: Moderate) after spinal fusion surgery, as well as the PCA (analgesia medication use) (SMD = −1.67, 95% CI [−2.67 to −0.67], GRADE: Moderate). However, EPSB had no effect on intraoperative blood loss (SMD = −0.28, 95% CI [−1.03 to 0.47], GRADE: Low) and length of hospital stay (SMD = −0.27, 95% CI [−0.60–0.06], GRADE: Low). Conclusion Combined with the current findings, EPSB may reduce pain scores in spinal fusion surgery, possibly reducing the use of postoperative analgesics. However, due to the limitations of the study, we need more high-quality, multi-center, large sample randomized controlled trials to merge.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.