Abstract

The pulse transition features (PTFs), including pulse arrival time (PAT) and pulse transition time (PTT), hold significant importance in estimating non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP). However, the literature showcases considerable variations in terms of PTFs' correlation with blood pressure (BP), accuracy in NIBP estimation, and the comprehension of the relationship between PTFs and BP. This inconsistency is exemplified by the wide-ranging correlations reported across studies investigating the same feature. Furthermore, investigations comparing PAT and PTT have yielded conflicting outcomes. Additionally, PTFs have been derived from various bio-signals, capturing distinct characteristic points like the pulse's foot and peak. To address these inconsistencies, this study meticulously reviews a selection of such research endeavors while aligning them with the biological intricacies of blood pressure and the human cardiovascular system (CVS). Each study underwent evaluation, considering the specific signal acquisition locale and the corresponding recording procedure. Moreover, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted, yielding multiple conclusions that could significantly enhance the design and accuracy of NIBP systems. Grounded in these dual aspects, the study systematically examines PTFs in correlation with the specific study conditions and the underlying factors influencing the CVS. This approach serves as a valuable resource for researchers aiming to optimize the design of BP recording experiments, bio-signal acquisition systems, and the fine-tuning of feature engineering methodologies, ultimately advancing PTF-based NIBP estimation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call