Abstract
AbstractIn this meta‐analysis, we synthesized 42 between‐group studies (N = 4114) evaluating the effectiveness of culturally adapted cognitive behavioral therapy (CA‐CBT) on reducing depression and anxiety severity when compared to waitlist/control groups and active alternative treatments. Separate random‐effects meta‐analyses revealed moderate‐to‐large effect sizes in favor of CA‐CBT on depression and anxiety when compared to active alternative treatments and waitlist/control groups. Independent random‐effects models revealed evidence of publication bias and indicated influential moderating effects on anxiety. Implications for counselor practice are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
