Abstract
Abstract Chapter 9 discusses how message repetition can undermine citizens’ internal deliberations by leading them to double-count the same piece of information. When speakers do not maintain their epistemic independence, they can lead their listeners to attribute to much weigh to their claims in internal deliberation—a case of epistemic overinclusion. This threat to informal networked deliberation can be mitigated through the adoption of special deliberative norms by citizens and influentials alike and the redesign of social media platforms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
