Abstract

An important ingredient of any moving-mesh method for fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems is the mesh moving technique (MMT) used to adapt the computational mesh in the moving fluid domain. An ideal MMT is computationally inexpensive, can handle large mesh motions without inverting mesh elements and can sustain an FSI simulation for extensive periods of time without irreversibly distorting the mesh. Here we compare several commonly used MMTs which are based on the solution of elliptic partial differential equations, including harmonic extension, bi-harmonic extension and techniques based on the equations of linear elasticity. Moreover, we propose a novel MMT which utilizes ideas from continuation methods to efficiently solve the equations of nonlinear elasticity and proves to be robust even when the mesh undergoes extreme motions. In addition to that, we study how each MMT behaves when combined with the mesh-Jacobian-based stiffening. Finally, we evaluate the performance of different MMTs on a popular two-dimensional FSI benchmark reproduced by using an isogeometric partitioned solver with strong coupling.

Highlights

  • Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) constitutes a class of problems involving two-way dependence between structural objects and a fluid

  • When performing the FSI simulation, we apply each of the seven mesh moving technique (MMT) (HE, incremental harmonic extension (IHE), bi-harmonic extension (BE), incremental variation of the bi-harmonic extension (IBE), linear elasticity (LE), incremental linear elasticity (ILE) and tangential incremental nonlinear elasticity (TINE)) and study how a particular MMT handles the mesh motion occurring during the simulation

  • We have described and compared several MMTs which can be used within moving-mesh methods for FSI problems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) constitutes a class of problems involving two-way dependence between structural objects and a fluid. Computational Mechanics (2021) 67:583–600 periodic regime which lends itself well to studying possible long-term effects of MMTs on the fluid mesh One of such long-term effects is accumulated mesh distortion where mesh elements increasingly become permanently distorted, deteriorating the simulation accuracy. In addition to the original benchmark, we employ its simplified version with no fluid mechanics involved to perform a large number of computationally inexpensive tests. In this way, we can concentrate on mesh motion and conduct a detailed analysis of the behavior of MMTs. To reproduce the FSI benchmark, we use a partitioned solver with strong coupling and Aitken relaxation [17].

Benchmark description
Structure motion
Fluid motion
Initial and boundary conditions
Interaction conditions
Geometry parametrization
Mesh moving techniques
Bijectivity check
Benchmark ALE: mesh motion
Single period test
Long-term behavior test
Benchmark FSI2: flow-induced vibrations
Results
Discussion and conclusion
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call