Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are effective against various malignancies. However, adverse events including diarrhea and colitis can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Recommendations for the management of ICI mediateddiarrhea and colitisinclude steroids and biologics. Given their associated risks, this study evaluated the role of thenon-immunosuppressive agents, mesalamine and or cholestyramine. This is a retrospective, descriptive, single-center study of adults who developed ICI diarrhea and colitis between 2010 and 2020 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinical data and outcomes were compared between those treated with the non-immunosuppressive therapies mesalamine and/or cholestyramine alone versus those who received additional immunosuppression with steroids and biologics. Our sample comprised 66 patients wherein, the mean age was 63years, 71% were males, and 97% had stage III/IV cancers. Fourteen patients were treated successfully with non-immunosuppressive therapy. They had grade 1-3 diarrhea and 1-2 colitis with no difference inthe rate of histologic colitis compared to those who received immunosuppressive therapy. They had less CTLA-4 inhibitor-based therapy (36% vs. 73%, p = 0.034), delayed onset of symptoms (159 vs. 64days, p = 0.011), lower fecal calprotectin levels (56 vs. 234, p = 0.012) and were more likely to resume ICI therapy (64% vs. 25%, p = 0.006). Mesalamine and/or cholestyramine may be effective for mild ICI diarrhea and colitis among patients with delayed symptom onset with lower colonic inflammatory burden. Prospective studies randomizing patients with mild colitis between mesalamine/cholestyramine and immunosuppressive treatment are warranted to assess their efficacy and safety.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call