Abstract

This concise presentation of the essential characteristics of the theological argument in the catechetical homilies of Severus has shown how it departs from the central statements of the Creed, in order to expound Christian doctrine in all its splendour through a multitude of biblical texts, in a kind of spiritual meditation. In comparison with Severus’ dogmatic works, the argument in the homilies shows differences in substance as well as in methodology. As regards content, other priorities are set. Whereas the dogmatic works are completely taken up with the Christological question, in the homilies a similar urgency is found in the treatment of diverse themes, such as the old yet ever present Arian question of the divine identity of Christ, and the visibly growing phenomenon of Manichaeism. Methodologically, at least regarding Christology, with which a comparison is possible, the entire patristic system seems to disappear. Whereas in the dogmatic writings, the interpretation of the writings of the Church Fathers, in particular those of Cyril, is at the heart of the discussion, the homilies simplify Christology by limiting it to fundamental biblical pronouncements.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call