Abstract

This paper tries to look at the relation between intelligence and meritocracy where the concept of intelligence has legitimized the concept of meritocracy. Viewing intelligence as a stable or fixed entity, the concept of intelligence has legitimized the concept of ‘meritocracy’. In the name of merit based society, a large number of intelligence tests are being developed, thus, categorizing and labeling the individuals on fixed traits. The paper tries to give a unique perspective to meritocracy which has largely stood for long on the entity theory of intelligence which says that intelligence is a fixed trait and that it cannot improve through effort. Borrowing the concept of incremental theory from the implicit theory perspective (Dweck and Leggett, 1988) which posits that intelligence is not a stable entity and can improve through effort, this paper contributes a critic to the concept of meritocracy which stands on the construct of intelligence which is superficial and still struggling to reach a consensus on its definition. The paper provides useful insights to the field of education, psychology and sociology.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.