Abstract

In research, public, and policy debate, there is increasing interest in data intensive firms like Google, Facebook, and Amazon. As business models of data firms are often characterized by high scale economies and network externalities, they are expected to have a particularly large incentive to grow, among others through mergers and acqui- sitions (M&A). Adding to the up to now mainly theoretical or anecdotal discussion on data intensive firms, this study empirically analyzes the relationship between firms’ data intensity and M&A activity. Using text-based measures to identify data inten- sive firms, I find that data generators are more likely to become acquirers, whereas data analysis and storage companies are more likely to become targets. Transactions by data firms, on average, do not create value as abnormal announcement returns are zero. There is evidence for pre-emptive merger activity, i.e., data intensive firms acquiring particularly often rather small, non-public companies that are not (yet) on the radar of competition authorities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.