Abstract

Black hole binaries formed dynamically in globular clusters are believed to be one of the main sources of gravitational waves in the Universe. Here, we use our new population synthesis code, cBHBd, to determine the redshift evolution of the merger rate density and masses of black hole binaries formed in globular clusters. We simulate $\sim 2$ million models to explore the parameter space that is relevant to real clusters and over all mass scales. We show that when uncertainties on the initial cluster mass function and density are properly taken into account, they become the two dominant factors in setting the theoretical error bars on merger rates. Other model parameters (e.g., natal kicks, black hole masses, metallicity) have virtually no effect on the local merger rate density, although they affect the masses of the merging black holes. Modelling the merger rate density as a function of redshift as $R(z)=R_0(1+z)^\kappa$ at $z<2$, and marginalizing over uncertainties, we find: $R_0=7.2^{+21.5}_{-5.5}{\rm Gpc^{-3}yr^{-1}}$ and $\kappa=1.6^{+0.4}_{-0.6}$ ($90\%$ credibility). The rate parameters for binaries that merge inside the clusters are ${R}_{\rm 0,in}=1.6^{+1.9}_{-1.0}{\rm Gpc^{-3}yr^{-1}}$ and $\kappa_{\rm in}=2.3^{+1.3}_{-1.0}$; $\sim 20\%$ of these form as the result of a gravitational-wave capture, implying that eccentric mergers from globular clusters contribute $\lesssim 0.4 \rm Gpc^{-3}yr^{-1}$ to the local rate. A comparison to the merger rate reported by LIGO-Virgo shows that a scenario in which most of the detected black hole mergers are formed in globular clusters is consistent with current constraints, and requires initial cluster half-mass densities $\gtrsim 10^4 M_\odot \rm pc^{-3}$. Such models also reproduce the inferred primary black hole mass distribution for masses $13-30 M_\odot$, but under-predict the data outside this range.

Highlights

  • Several black hole (BH) binaries have been detected by the advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) and Virgo interferometer [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]

  • While the details of this method are described in Antonini and Gieles [34], here we give a brief summary of the model philosophy, including the full set of differential equations that are used to compute the secular evolution of the cluster models and the merging BH binary (BHB) they produce

  • The low merger rate value at ≳40 M⊙ is a consequence of the stellar mass loss prior to the formation of the BHs because a down-turn above 30 M⊙ is seen in the BH initial mass function (IMF), and we find it even in models that do not include any prescription for pair instability [87]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Several black hole (BH) binaries have been detected by the advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) and Virgo interferometer [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The main reason for this is that standard numerical techniques such as N-body and Monte Carlo simulations are still too slow to allow a full parameter space exploration This is why in this study we employ our new population synthesis code clusterBHBdynamics (hereafter cBHBd) [34] to systematically vary assumptions made for the model parameters and over the full range of initial conditions relevant to real GCs. we examine the effect of these initial assumptions on the number and properties of merging BHBs using a suite of about 20 million cluster models. We build on former studies in two ways which allow us to place error bars on theoretical estimates for the BHB merger rate density and on its redshift evolution: (i) we constrain the fractional mass that has been lost from GCs over cosmic time by fitting an evolved Schechter mass function to the observed GCMF in the Milky Way today and using a simple model for cluster evaporation.

CLUSTER FORMATION RATE
Globular clusters density in the Universe
Globular cluster mass function
The GC formation rate
METHODOLOGY
ClusterBH
BHBdynamics
Black hole mass function and natal kicks
Cluster formation and initial properties
BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGER RATE
In-cluster vs ejected binaries
Dependence on model parameters
Present-day GC mass density
Initial GC density in the Universe
O-star ejections and IMBH formation
Cluster mass loss and initial GCMF
Primordial binaries
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call