Abstract

Competition for food resources is widespread in nature. The foraging behaviour of social animals should thus be adapted to potential food competition. We conjectured that in the presence of co-foragers, animals would shift their tactics to forage more frequently for smaller food. Because smaller foods are more abundant in nature and allow faster consumption, such tactics should allow animals to consume food more securely against scrounging. We experimentally tested whether such a shift would be triggered automatically in human eating behaviour, even when there was no rivalry about food consumption. To prevent subjects from having rivalry, they were instructed to engage in a ‘taste test' in a laboratory, alone or in pairs. Even though the other subject was merely present and there was no real competition for food, subjects in pairs immediately exhibited a systematic behavioural shift to reaching for smaller food amounts more frequently, which was clearly distinct from their reaching patterns both when eating alone and when simply weighing the same food without eating any. These patterns suggest that behavioural shifts in the presence of others may be built-in tactics in humans (and possibly in other gregarious animals as well) to adapt to potential food competition in social foraging.

Highlights

  • Many animal species forage for food with other individuals

  • In the Visible and Invisible Pair conditions, reach frequencies of subjects were higher compared to the Solo condition

  • The mere presence of a co-eater in the Visible Pair condition increased the reach frequency for food and decreased the weight of food per reach, as compared to the Solo condition. This result supports our hypothesis that the behavioural shift toward foraging smaller food more frequently would be triggered automatically among human subjects, even when there was no actual competition about food consumption

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many animal species forage for food with other individuals. Social foraging provides animals with various benefits, including higher encounter rate with food resources and collective monitoring against predators, due to information sharing [1]. On the other hand, such information sharing creates competition among royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R. Co-foragers, because others can free-ride on a food-finder’s search efforts and steal their food [2]. To deal with 2 such competition, animals may adopt different foraging tactics in a group situation than when foraging alone

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call