Abstract
This article tells the long history of poetry's relation to music and religion through the story of common meter in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Combining a new formalist sensibility of the text together with the more recent theories developed by the New Lyric studies, it aims to correct a critical coding of early modern poetry that distinguishes popular--as verse, meter, doggerel, rhyme--from elite, "literary" poetic production, despite its best-known poet, Thomas Sternhold, being a member of elite court circles. Enabled by a blinkered focus on a so-called "purely literary" poetic heritage routed through Tottel's Miscellany, the history of the sound of post-medieval English poetry has relied on divorcing it from its origins in musical church practices. Taking up the examples of Thomas Wyatt and George Herbert and then turning to Thomas Hardy and George Eliot's depictions of the nineteenth-century schism in church musical practices, this essay reveals how writers at once depended upon the common meter of Sternhold and John Hopkins while increasingly insisting upon an emerging literary elite at a distance from such metered rhyme.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.