Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to use shotgun next-generation sequencing to unravel the microbial community structure of an agricultural soil, decipher the effects of mercury contamination on the structure of the microbial community and the soil physicochemistry and heavy metals content.ResultsThe soil physicochemistry after mercury contamination revealed a shift in soil pH from neutral (6.99 ± 0.001) to acidic (5.96 ± 0.25), a decline in moisture content to < 4 %, and a significant decrease in the concentrations of all the macronutrients and the total organic matter. Significant decrease in all the heavy metals detected in the agricultural soil was also observed in mercury inundated SL3 microcosm. Structural analysis of the metagenomes of SL1 (agricultural soil) and SL3 (mercury-contaminated agricultural soil) using Illumina shotgun next-generation sequencing revealed the loss due to mercury contamination of 54.75 % of the microbial community consisting of an archaeal domain, 11 phyla, 12 classes, 24 orders, 36 families, 59 genera, and 86 species. The dominant phylum, class, genus, and species in SL1 metagenome are Proteobacteria, Bacilli, Staphylococcus, and Sphingobacterium sp. 21; while in SL3 metagenome, Proteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Singulisphaera, and Singulisphaera acidiphila were preponderant. Mercury contamination resulted in a massive upscale in the population of members of the phylum Planctomycetes and the genera Singulisphaera, Brevundimonas, Sanguibacter, Exiguobacterium, Desulfobacca, and Proteus in SL3 metagenome while it causes massive decline in the population of genera Staphylococcus and Brachybacterium.ConclusionsThis study revealed that mercury contamination of the agricultural soil imposed selective pressure on the members of the microbial community, which negatively impact on their population, alter soil physicochemistry, and enriched sizable numbers of members of the community that are well adapted to mercury stress. It also reveals members of microbial community hitherto not reported to be important in mercury detoxification process.

Highlights

  • The release of heavy metals into the environment through agricultural and industrial operations and the consequences of these pollution on ecosystems and human health are sources of serious concern (Robinson and Tuovinen 1984; Lapanje et al 2010)

  • Salam et al Bulletin of the National Research Centre (2019) 43:163 on the soil microbial community (Nies 1999; Biester et al 2002; Barkay et al 2003; Lapanje et al 2010). Essential heavy metals such as zinc, copper, iron, and chromium are important to life

  • Heavy metals with no known biological function such as mercury are very toxic to the cell

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The release of heavy metals into the environment through agricultural and industrial operations and the consequences of these pollution on ecosystems and human health are sources of serious concern (Robinson and Tuovinen 1984; Lapanje et al 2010). Mercurial compounds have been used as insecticides, Salam et al Bulletin of the National Research Centre (2019) 43:163 on the soil microbial community (Nies 1999; Biester et al 2002; Barkay et al 2003; Lapanje et al 2010). Essential heavy metals such as zinc, copper, iron, and chromium are important to life. Exposure to mercury reduces photosynthesis, transpiration rate, water uptake, and chlorophyll synthesis It causes loss of potassium, magnesium and manganese and accumulation of iron (Boening 2000). The purpose of this study is to use shotgun next-generation sequencing to unravel the microbial community structure of an agricultural soil, decipher the effects of mercury contamination on the structure of the microbial community and the soil physicochemistry and heavy metals content

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call