Abstract

Mepivacaine spinal anesthetic may facilitate more rapid postoperative recovery in joint arthroplasty than bupivacaine. This study compared recovery, pain, and complications between the 2 anesthetics in anterior-approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center (ASC). This retrospective cohort study of 282 consecutive patients with mean age 55.7±8.8 years and body mass index 30.6±5.3 who underwent THA at an ASC from November 2018 to July 2020 compares mepivacaine (n= 141) vs bupivacaine (n= 141) spinal anesthesia, a transition made in March 2019. The main outcomes were length of stay in the postoperative unit (post acute care unit) prior to same-day discharge (SDD), time to controlled void, and ambulation. Secondarily, postoperative pain scores (0-10) with morphine equivalents were required and any postoperative complications were compared. Mepivacaine decreased mean post acute care unit stay (4.0 vs 5.7hours, P < .001), time to void (3.1 vs 4.9hours, P < .001), and ambulation (3.2 vs 4.5hours, P < .001). No patients needed urinary catheterization or overnight stay. Two patients in the bupivacaine group had transient neurologic symptoms, consisting of foot drop and spinal headache, compared to none with mepivacaine (P= .498). Mepivacaine patients had increased postoperative pain at 2hours (1.7 vs 0.9, P < .001), at discharge (1.1 vs 0.5, P= .004), and morphine equivalent doses received (7.8 vs 3.7 mg, P < .001). Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia for anterior-approach THA safely facilitated more rapid SDD from the ASC through decreased times to controlled void and ambulation with only minor increase in pain when compared to bupivacaine. Level III - Retrospective comparative cohort study.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.