Mental Representations of Values and Behaviors

Gabriel Lins De Holanda Coelho,Gregory R Maio,Paul H P Hanel,Mark K Johansen

doi:10.1177/08902070211034385

Abstract

The present research provides the first direct assessment of the fit of diverse behaviors to putatively related personal and social values from Schwartz’s theory. Across three studies, we examined spatial representations of value-related behaviors that were explicitly derived from people’s mental representations of the values. Participants were asked how similar the behaviors were to each other and various values, and these judgments were used to specify multidimensional scaling solutions. The results indicated that the spatial representation of the behaviors was consistent with the two-dimensional space described in Schwartz’s model of values, although several deviations occurred. For example, self-enhancement behaviors were widely spread, indicating more variation in the way individuals interpret these behaviors, which are often associated with other value types. These data provide evidence that a range of behaviors can at least partly be reduced to underlying motivations expressed by values. Furthermore, our findings indicate that behaviors are often expressed by several values, which might help to explain why value–behavior associations in previous studies were weak. Finally, they illustrate a new approach to learning which behaviors might relate to multiple values.

Highlights

The present research provides the first direct assessment of the fit of diverse behaviors to putatively related personal and social values from Schwartz’s theory
We examined participants’ perceptions of the similarities between behavioral instantiations of values with Schwartz’s 10 value types (Study 1), Schwartz’s four higher order values (Study 2), and other behavioral instantiations of values (Study 3)
We presented the list of forty behaviors instances

Summary

Introduction

The present research provides the first direct assessment of the fit of diverse behaviors to putatively related personal and social values from Schwartz’s theory. Our findings indicate that behaviors are often expressed by several values, which might help to explain why value–behavior associations in previous studies were weak They illustrate a new approach to learning which behaviors might relate to multiple values. The G20 group of nations recently initiated annual Values (“V20”) summits to explicitly consider common values among the G20 nations and the actions they express (https:// values20.org/) These assumptions about the importance of values are reinforced by research examining connections between values and behaviors (Bardi & Schwartz, 2003; Boer & Fischer, 2013; Lee et al, in press; Rokeach, 1973; Skimina et al, 2019). A key problem in examining the interrelations between values and behaviors is the difficulty of conceptually linking specific values to specific behaviors

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion