Abstract
Subjects made judgements of resolution on two small dots that they either imagined or acutally observed at horizontal and vertical positions away from the point of eye fixation. As the distance between these two dots increased, the size of fields of resolution in imagery increased, in proportion to increases in the size of fields of resolution in perception. For vivid imagers, fields of resolution in imagery were the same size as those in perception, whereas for nonvivid imagers, fields of resolution in imagery were smaller than those in perception. In addition, fields of resolution in imagery and perception were virtually identical in shape, exhibiting similar horizontal eccentricity and vertical asymmetry. Fields within which attention can be distributed in imagery were also measured by having subjects make judgements of resolution on pairs of dot patterns imagined simultaneously on opposite sides of the point of eye fixation. These fields were smaller than fields of resolution for images of single dot patterns and were circular, as opposed to elliptical. These results suggest that peripheral acuity in visual imagery is limited by the same types of neural constraints that limit peripheral acuity in visual perception.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
