Abstract

The aimis to identify the priority directions for preventing mental disorders in disabled children following a comprehensive analysis of clinical, social, psychological, ethnic and cultural characteristics over 2009– 2017.Materials and methods. 2,204 people were included in the study: disabled children, students of remedial schools aged 7–18 years old (n = 834); parents of disabled children (n = 772); teachers working in various educational facilities (n = 217); respondents of the survey identifying people’s attitude towards children with disabilities (schoolchildren, students, adults, n = 381). Clinical, psychological and statistical methods were used in the study. To identify depression and anxiety in children, Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI), Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS), PedsQL inventory, survey on coping strategies (E. Heim) and adapted questionnaires for suicidal risk and alexithymia were used. For adult participants, the Quality of Life Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and a questionnaire identifying the attitude towards children with disabilities were applied.Results. A high prevalence of mental disorders in children with disabilities (62.7–95.2%) was identified, and the levels of anxiety, suicidal risk, alexithymia were determined. Children’s families were characterized by impaired structure (50%), parenting styles resulting in pathologies (71.5%), low income level (60%), low qualifications of parents and unemployment (13%), alcohol abuse (17.6%), victimized attitudes and low satisfaction with the psychological criteria of quality of life, combined with low level of anxiety. For teachers, the levels of anxiety and depression and signs of burnout were revealed, and the features of their interaction with disabled children in the educational process were described. The attitude of different social groups to children with disabilities was studied. The methodological conditions for carrying out research and organizing medical and psychological care were formulated.Conclusion. Prevention of mental disorders in disabled children includes identification of early signs of anxiety, depression, suicidal risk and assessment of the quality of life and work. This is ensured by a reasonable choice of research methods, psychosocial rehabilitation with involvement of beloved people, and increase in the tolerance level towards children with disabilities in the society.

Highlights

  • Children’s families were characterized by impaired structure (50%), parenting styles resulting in pathologies (71.5%), low income level (60%), low qualifications of parents and unemployment (13%), alcohol abuse (17.6%), victimized attitudes and low satisfaction with the psychological criteria of quality of life, combined with low level of anxiety

  • Karaush Irina S., DM, Leading Researcher, Borderline States Department, Mental Health Research Institute, National Research Medical Centre, Tomsk, Russian Federation

Read more

Summary

ОРИГИНАЛ Н Е СТАТ И RI INAL AR ICLES

 èññëåäîâàíèè ïðèíÿëè ó÷àñòèå 2 204 ÷åëîâåêà, â òîì ÷èñëå äåòè-èíâàëèäû, ó÷àùèåñÿ êîððåêöèîííûõ øêîë 7–18 ëåò (n = 834); ðîäèòåëè äåòåé-èíâàëèäîâ (n = 772); ïåäàãîãè, ðàáîòàþùèå â ðàçëè÷íûõ ñèñòåìàõ îáðàçîâàíèÿ (n = 217); ó÷àñòíèêè îïðîñà ïî âûÿâëåíèþ îòíîøåíèÿ ê äåòÿì-èíâàëèäàì (øêîëüíèêè, ñòóäåíòû, âçðîñëûå ëèöà, n = 381). Èñïîëüçîâàëèñü øêàëû íà âûÿâëåíèå ó äåòåé äåïðåññèè (CDI), òðåâîæíîñòè (CMAS), îïðîñíèêè PedsQL, êîïèíã-ñòðàòåãèé Äëÿ ðîäèòåëåé èñïîëüçîâàëèñü îïðîñíèêè êà÷åñòâà æèçíè, øêàëû òðåâîãè Ãàìèëüòîíà, HADS, â ãðóïïàõ ó÷àùèõñÿ, ñòóäåíòîâ è âçðîñëûõ – îïðîñíèê íà âûÿâëåíèå îòíîøåíèÿ ê äåòÿì-èíâàëèäàì. Âûÿâëåíà âûñîêàÿ ðàñïðîñòðàíåííîñòü ïñèõè÷åñêèõ ðàññòðîéñòâ ó äåòåé-èíâàëèäîâ (62,7–95,2%), îïðåäåëåíû óðîâíè òðåâîãè, ñóèöèäàëüíîãî ðèñêà, àëåêñèòèìèè. Íàïðàâëåíèÿ ïðåâåíöèè ïñèõè÷åñêèõ íàðóøåíèé ó äåòåé-èíâàëèäîâ âêëþ÷àþò âûÿâëåíèå ðàííèõ ïðèçíàêîâ òðåâîãè, äåïðåññèè, ñóèöèäàëüíîãî ðèñêà, îöåíêó êà÷åñòâà æèçíè è ôóíêöèîíèðîâàíèÿ. Àâòîðû çàÿâëÿþò îá îòñóòñòâèè ôèíàíñèðîâàíèÿ ïðè ïðîâåäåíèè èññëåäîâàíèÿ. Ó÷àñòíèêè èññëåäîâàíèÿ (ó÷àùèåñÿ ñòàðøå 14 ëåò, èõ ðîäèòåëè) ïîäïèñûâàëè èíôîðìèðîâàííîå ñîãëàñèå. Èññëåäîâàíèå îäîáðåíî ëîêàëüíûì ýòè÷åñêèì êîìèòåòîì ïðè Íàó÷íî-èññëåäîâàòåëüñêîì èíñòèòóòå ïñèõè÷åñêîãî çäîðîâüÿ, Òîìñêèé ÍÈÌÖ (ïðîòîêîëû No 46 îò 02.11.2009, No 48 îò 26.03.2012, No 54 îò 06.11.2012)

Оригинальные статьи
Results
Conclusion
МАТЕРИАЛЫ И МЕТОДЫ
Õàðàêòåðèñòèêà ãðóïïû Group description
Âñåãî Total
Ïîêàçàòåëü Parameter
Ïàòîëîãèÿ ðîäîâ Birth defects
Õàðàêòåðèñòèêà Description
Àãðåññèÿ Aggression
The most revealing questions
Сведения об авторах
Authors information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call