Abstract
In this paper I argue that specific mental health law should not exist and should be replaced by modern guardianship law which is non-discriminatory and which intervenes according to need rather than diagnostic classification. Substituted consent provided by a guardian protects the patient and the treatment provider. Custody to prevent danger to others should remain with courts rather than informal proceedings where individual rights to freedom are less carefully protected. Special mental health law stigmatises people with mental illness and degrades their treatment. It also diminishes the standing of the psychiatric profession which advocates the continuation of such laws.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
