Abstract

Those involved in financial reporting and voluntary disclosure routinely make decisions about how to describe transactions and economic events. Key components of these decisions include how to label information, whether to aggregate or disaggregate it, and how frequently to provide it. For example, firms reporting under IFRS rules must determine whether to label interest paid as an operating or financing cash flow. Analysts evaluating a firm’s compound financial instruments must decide whether to consider them as reported (i.e., as one unit of account) or bifurcate them into their component parts. The purpose of this paper is twofold: First, we describe a robust theory from psychology, mental accounting, that can help explain how those involved in financial reporting and voluntary disclosure might make these kinds of decisions and evaluate them. Second, we provide illustrative examples of how this theory can aid scholars in their research on financial reporting issues, including those currently facing standard setters.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.