Abstract

Background: Menstrual cycle dysfunction is associated with insulin resistance; however, the evidence linking irregular/long menstrual cycles with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is scarce and inconsistent. It is also unclear whether this relation can be modified by lifestyle factors. Methods: Between 1993 and 2017, we followed 75,546 premenopausal women without T2D at baseline who reported the usual length and regularity of their menstrual cycles at ages of 14-17, 18-22, and 29-46 years, as well as data on body weight, smoking status, physical activity, and diet every 2-4 years during follow-up. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidential intervals (CI) for the associations between menstrual cycle characteristics and T2D risk. Findings: We documented 5,608 new cases of T2D. After adjusting for potential confounders including BMI and lifestyle factors, women reporting always having irregular menstrual cycles between the ages of 14-17, 18-22, and 29-46 years were, respectively, 33% (95% CI: 23, 45%), 42% (95% CI: 23, 63%), and 66% (95% CI: 49, 84%) more likely to develop T2D than women reporting very regular cycles in the same age range. Similarly, women reporting usual cycle length ≥40 days between the ages of 18-22 and 29-46 years also had a higher risk of T2D than women reporting a usual cycle length of 26-31 days in the same age range (HRs=1.37; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.58 and 1.49; 95% CI: 1.36, 1.64, respectively). These relations were stronger for women with overweight/obesity and a lower level of physical activity when additive interaction was evaluated. Interpretation : Irregular and long menstrual cycles throughout life are associated with a higher risk of T2D, with a particularly elevated risk among women who were overweight/obesity and physical inactivity. Funding Statement: The National Institutes of Health grants U01-HL145386, U01-CA176726, R01-HL034594, R01-HL088521, DK120870, and DK112940. Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no competing interest. Ethics Approval Statement: Study procedures have been approved by the institutional review boards of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call