Abstract
Abstract This chapter reviews data on amnesia in humans and other animals. It argues that hippocampal ‘amnesia’ does not result from changes in a particular type of memory and does not depend primarily on effects of delay and context. Relational memory, configural memory, semantic encoding, recognition memory, working memory, temporal buffering, and spatial memory are all shown to fail as an explanation of hippocampal sensitivity of learning and memory. The nature of hippocampal deficits, both in tasks involving memory and those involving innate responses, are more consistent with the view that hippocampal damage removes the capacity to select between strongly competing, conflicting goals by increased avoidance of one of the alternatives — in many memory tasks this adds up to the capacity to eliminate interference of whatever origin.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
