Abstract

The philosopher Bernard Stiegler argues that the ever-increasing technologization of memory is complicit with the shift in the nature of power toward a society of control. Stiegler borrows this term from Gilles Deleuze but, rather than rely on the definition of the term set out in the “Postscript,” Stiegler argues that the society of control is characterized by the total automation of consumption. Rather than just the means of production, in the control society consumption and the network of desires and affective intensities that drive consumption have become automated. Stiegler argues that the fundamental interdependence of memory and technology is the crucial battleground on which the transition toward the nightmarish vision of the control society is negotiated and contested. He starts from the premise that the externalization of memory in technological tools is constitutive of humanity. As Stiegler explains in his essay “Memory,” which introduces ideas explored in greater detail in his three-volume Technics and Time, he uses the term “hypomnesis” to describe the technical exteriorization of memory, which he opposes to the act of embodied memory “anamnesis.” “Mnemotechniques” are the systems of artificial storage of individual memories, such as writing systems, that characterize this process of hypomnesis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.