Abstract

BackgroundAplasia cutis congenita (ACC) is a rare congenital condition characterized by the absence of skin layers and sometimes other underlying structures, in a localized or widespread area. The exact etiopathogenesis is not yet completely understood. Membranous ACC (MACC) also described as bullous or cystic ACC is a clinical subtype of ACC, covered with a membranous or glistening surface, and appears as a flat scar. There are less than 20 cases reported in the literature. It has been proposed an abortive form of a defective closure of the neural tube. On the other hand, the trisomy 18 is a chromosomal abnormality characterized by a broad clinical spectrum and the presence of defective closure of the neural tube.Case presentationWe report on an 18-months-old Venezuelan boy, who presented on the parietal scalp a distinctive localized MACC appearing as an oval lesion covered with a membranous surface, characterized by the absence of hairs and the presence of a sharp hair collar. The karyotype in peripheral blood was 47,XY,+ 18.ConclusionsThis is the second case report of ACC in trisomy 18 and reinforces the interpretation of a non-fortuitous association as well as of a defective closure of the neural tube as pathogenetic mechanism. The case highlights the importance of examining for dermatological alterations such as ACC in cases of chromosomopathy.

Highlights

  • Aplasia cutis congenita (ACC) is a rare congenital condition characterized by the absence of skin layers and sometimes other underlying structures, in a localized or widespread area [1,2,3]

  • Membranous ACC (MACC) described as bullous or cystic ACC is a clinical subtype of ACC, covered with a membranous or glistening surface [3, 8], and appears as a flat scar

  • We present the second case of ACC associated with trisomy 18 to emphasize that the association might not be fortuitous and that the pathogenesis may reflect a defective closure of the neural tube

Read more

Summary

Conclusions

This is the second case report of ACC in trisomy 18 and reinforces the interpretation of a nonfortuitous association as well as of a defective closure of the neural tube as pathogenetic mechanism.

Background
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call