Abstract
Membrane gas-solvent contactors have received much attention for CO2 absorption, as the approach incorporates advantages from both solvent absorption and membrane gas separation. This study reports on pilot plant trials of three membrane contactors for the separation of CO2 from flue gas. The contactors were porous polypropylene (PP), porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and non-porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), with the solvent PuraTreatTM FTM. To enable performance comparison, laboratory measurements based on a gas mixture of 10% CO2 in N2 were also undertaken on the same contactor–solvent systems. It was found that the PP contactor experienced significant pore wetting in both laboratory and pilot plant studies. In contrast, the PTFE contactor experienced only minor pore wetting in the laboratory. However, in the pilot plant trial of the PTFE contactor extensive pore wetting was observed, and the overall mass transfer coefficient measured was comparable with the PP contactor. The non-porous PDMS contactor had an overall mass transfer coefficient two orders of magnitude less than the PP contactor, due to the greater mass transfer resistance of the polymeric film. However, the non-porous membrane does not experience pore wetting, which resulted in the overall mass transfer coefficient being similar for both laboratory and pilot plant measurements.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
